Cases 1 - 10 of 644
Harris v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Michelle Irvine, Alexandria Neumeier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARPER v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2024cv01182
Petitioner:
IRVIN HARPER
Respondent:
K. BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kemp v. Shreveport PD
as 24-30167
Plaintiff:
Cameron Kemp
Defendant:
Shreveport Police Department, Ross Owens, R. Lee Irvin, Judge and others
Gulbronson, Brian v. Smith, Kyle et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Brian Gulbronson
Defendant:
Kyle Smith, Megan Kurtz, Shona Trappe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kemp v. Shreveport PD
as 24-30134
Plaintiff:
Cameron Kemp
Defendant:
Shreveport Police Department, Ross Owens, R. Lee Irvin, Judge and others
Myles v. Irvine
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Myles
Defendant:
Jasmyne Irvine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Begay v. USA
as 3:2024cv08024
Petitioner:
Randly Irvin Begay and Randly Begay
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Simpson v. Couch et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Irvin Lamar Simpson
Defendant:
Gerald Couch, Scott Cheeks, Bobby Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 4:2023cv06659
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin-Bey v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Duane Irvin-Bey
Defendant:
G Smith and Does B.O.P. Admininistrative Staff, Forrest City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
