Cases 1 - 10 of 9,036
King v. Ramsey County Jail et al
as 0:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Ramsey County Jail and All Ramsey County Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v All 7 Continents et al
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Millsapp, Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
DANIEL C. KING
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Xia v. King
as 0:2024cv02000
Petitioner:
Zhijun Xia
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell, Tyler Bly, Joshua Clamp and others
Defendant:
David Anderson, A. King, J. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. King
as 1:2024cv02449
Petitioner:
Donnell D. York
Respondent:
M King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
Tony Santiago Martinez
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe Officers 1-8, Chief of Police Frank Gamble, Police Officer Jorden Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Respondent:
ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SEAN BOONE, MAGGIE BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kenney v. King
as 9:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Erik G. Kenney
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abellard v. M.J. King
as 1:2024cv03719
Plaintiff:
Euzebelin Abellards
Defendant:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
