Cases 1 - 10 of 2,537
Calloway v. Kirk et al
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tracy Trinette Calloway
Defendant:
Eyvonne Kirk, Cicely Moore, Maria Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Authement v. Card et al
as 6:2024cv06068
Plaintiff:
Jerry Peter Authement
Defendant:
Cpl Mark Card, Samae Tucker, Sgt Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luzier v. Wheeler et al
as 6:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Luzier, III
Defendant:
Cleveland Wheeler, FNU Lane, Ryan Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Grimes v. Tim Lane
as 24-5456
Petitioner:
ANTHONY THOMAS GRIMES
Respondent:
TIM LANE, Warden
Jackson v. Scott County et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Scott County, Tim Lane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Javon Gardner v. Stephen Lane, et al
as 24-1965
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Norton, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, S. Davis, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Dykes v. Dutton et al
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lane Dykes, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Dutton, Officer Flippin, Detective Dalton Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Burnett v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of MDOC, in her official capacity, LIEUTENANT TAGGET, in individual capacity, LIEUTENANT BORIS, in individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
