Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,411
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff: TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant: BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mozee v. Chandler et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff: Patrick O Mozee
Defendant: Nathan Chandler and Jennifer Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Striegel v. White et al
as 6:2024cv06069
Plaintiff: Nathan F. Striegel
Defendant: Warden White, Major Otts and Lt. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomax v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Petitioner: Nathan Louis Lomax
Respondent: Brian Williams, NDOC and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nathan Albrecht v. Frank Vanihel
as 24-1833
Petitioner: NATHAN ALBRECHT
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
Bowling v. Spohn et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff: Roger Bowling
Defendant: Nathan Spohn, Unknown James and Unknown Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff: Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant: BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
McVey v. Attorney General of the State of Montana We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00056
Petitioner: Michael Nathan Shae McVey
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nathan Albrecht v. Frank Vanihel
as 24-1709
Petitioner: NATHAN ALBRECHT
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 24-11273
Plaintiff: THE ESTATE OF JOE NATHAN JAMES, JR.
Defendant: KAY IVEY, JOHN Q. HAMM, TERRY RAYBON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?