Cases 1 - 10 of 712
Dingle v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Defendant:
Phillip C Smith, Jr, Raquel West and Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tosto et al
as 2:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Cary C Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Rick G Tosto and Mayar Daiza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. McClean et al
as 4:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Smith, Jr and Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Joan McClean, Officer Todd Tallant, Does Badge Number 11-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6394
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-10362
Petitioner:
Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lane, Hale, Lance Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dennis Smith, Jr. v. Sgt. Rogers
as 24-6324
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KEITH SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SERGEANT ROGERS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, LT. JONES, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, COL. J. VERGAKIS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
