Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Stephen Barrett v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, et al
as 11-3434
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Stephen B. Barrett
Defendant - Appellant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sedgwick CMS Long-Term Disability Plan
Jaax v. Sedgwick CMS
as 4:2011cv00952
Plaintiff:
Philip Jaax
Defendant:
Sedgwick CMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Gray v. Sedgwick CMS
as 4:2011cv03326
Plaintiff:
Walter Gray
Defendant:
Sedgwick CMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Sedgwick CMS Insurance Company
as 2:2010cv02845
Plaintiff:
Chiara Jackson
Defendant:
Sedgwick CMS Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Coleman v. Sedgwick CMS Insurance Company, Administrator of the Unitedhealth Group Incorporated Long Term Disability Plan
as 4:2010cv00448
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Coleman
Defendant:
Sedgwick CMS Insurance Company, Administrator of the Unitedhealth Group Incorporated Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Barrett v. Sedgwick CMS Long-Term Disability Plan et al
as 0:2010cv03298
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Barrett
Defendant:
Sedgwick CMS Long-Term Disability Plan and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Sedgwick CMS, Inc. v. Whittington
as 3:2010cv00205
Plaintiff:
Sedgwick CMS, Inc.
Defendant:
Randell Wayne Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brantley v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00470
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Brantley
Defendant:
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc and Sedgwick CMS Claims Administrator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CARROLL v. SEDGWICK CMS
as 1:2009cv00709
Plaintiff:
JANICE C CARROLL
Defendant:
SEDGWICK CMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-ERISA
KIJOWSKI v. EATON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv00983
Plaintiff:
LOIS KIJOWSKI
Defendant:
EATON CORPORATION and SEDGWICK CMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
