Cases 51 - 60 of 388
Buchsbaum v. Digital Intelligence Systems, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00706
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 50, T-Mobile USA Inc. and Digital Intelligence Systems, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Buchsbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Maclin v. Metrocom, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00745
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC., LIMITLESS AKRON, LLC, KEVIN JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
QUIDA MACLIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bennett v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00166
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC, Peggy L Fletcher, Chad McKinley and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pomales v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 3:2020cv10258
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Rene Pomales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pomales v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 1:2020cv10258
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Rene Pomales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shumway v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 2:2019cv05436
Plaintiff:
Ryan Shumway
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Candice Lewis v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08392
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclsuive and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Candace Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alejandro Arzola v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07578
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC, Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Betty Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Arzola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gael F. Grob v. T Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv06352
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation and T Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
GAEL F. GROB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
