Cases 91 - 100 of 507
Parry v. Tomlin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Frank Clifford Parry, IV
Defendant:
Josh Tomlin, Leann Rymes, Gaybyn Hazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66822
Plaintiff:
KEVIN TOMLIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tomlin v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01612
Plaintiff:
John Henry Tomlin
Defendant:
David Shinn, Stacey Crabtree, Aracely Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43844
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P TOMLIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winters v. Greenwell et al
as 1:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Winters
Defendant:
Tommy Greenwell, Akins Torrence, Kristy Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Virgina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Virgina Department of Corrections, Virgina Department of Corrections Board, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. Homesite Insurance Company et al
as 7:2021cv00243
Defendant:
Hayden Tomlin and Homesite Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Angelica Salinas and Miguel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv01479
Defendant:
Coray Raymond Tomlin, Bernard Williams Jr., Melissa Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Sonny Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
