Cases 91 - 100 of 125
Miles v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2010cv03842
Plaintiff:
Tony Curtis Miles
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Institution Division, Michael B Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Local 0222
as 10-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COY PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCAL 0222, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AFI-CIO, ATS CORPORATION, (Trulinks/Trufone) and others
Kamega Roberts v. U.S. Attorney General
as 10-13935
Petitioner:
KAMEGA B. ROBERTS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
:
SERVICE
Robinson v. Viscuso et al
as 9:2010cv00993
Plaintiff:
Latee Robinson
Defendant:
Rome, R.N. Staff, J Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Tennessee et al v. Waters et al
as 3:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, William England, Peggy Marshall and others
Defendant:
Larry Waters , Phil King , Gary Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charlotte Costley v. Billy Curry, et al
as 10-50528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLOTTE DIANE COSTLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY CURRY, Chief of Police, Mart Police Department, B. ROBERTS, (EMT-B) Mart EMS, Inc. and MAUTBEY, Sargeant, Mart Police Department
State of Tennessee et al v. Waters et al
as 3:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, William England, Peggy Marshall and others
Defendant:
Larry Waters , Phil King , Gary Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Viscuso et al
as 1:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Latee Robinson
Defendant:
Viscuso, Rome, R.N. Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Costley v. Curry et al
as 6:2010cv00097
:
Defendant:
Billy Curry, Mautbey and B. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guillen v. Owens et al
as 2:2010cv00226
Plaintiff:
Karl Louis Guillen
Defendant:
Quincy Owens, Charles Ryan, B Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
