Cases 91 - 100 of 36,650
Phillips v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 3:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless and Boost Moble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. St Clair Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Julius A Hines
Defendant:
St Clair Correctional Facility, Dean Beauford, Antoine Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MJEAN et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MJEAN, NEFF and HEOLTERBRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holz v. LNU
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Phillip LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasek v. Barnett et al
as 6:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
James L. Vasek
Defendant:
Dolores June Barnett, Jeffrey Sharp, Thomas Phillip Eitel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Briseno et al
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Jamie Phillip Perry
Defendant:
Carri Briseno, Katherin Arnold, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. Platt et al
as 5:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mitchell Butler and Charles Gene Butler
Defendant:
Sergeant Katlyn M. Platt and Jerome Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Butler et al v. Dash
as 5:2024cv03188
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mitchell Butler and Charles Gene Butler
Defendant:
Judge Derrick F. Dash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
(PC) Grzeslo v. Phillips, et al.
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
James Grzeslo
Defendant:
Bryan D. Phillips, Idalberto Zaldivar-Galves, N. Scaife and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATICO v. GIANNOPOULOS
as 2:2024cv02212
Plaintiff:
DOMENICO PRATICO
Defendant:
PHILLIP GIANNOPOULOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
