Cases 101 - 110 of 130
Bell v. Cooks et al
as 8:2010cv03244
Plaintiff:
John Bell
Defendant:
Patricia Cooks and Vernon Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Cooks et al
as 2:2010cv03244
Plaintiff:
John Bell
Defendant:
Patricia Cooks, Vernon Tucker, Cecilia Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Maddoxs et al
as 3:2010cv03274
Defendant:
Ryan Maddoxs, Katie Mauer, Dave Hannah and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell M Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv11338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Affiliated Foods Midwest Cooperative, Inc. v. Wolf Creek Marketplace, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02012
Plaintiff:
Affiliated Foods Midwest Cooperative, Inc.
Defendant:
Wolf Creek Marketplace, Inc., Ed McIntosh, John Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Layne et al v. Grundy County, TN et al
as 4:2009cv00111
Plaintiff:
Scottie Layne, Judy Layne and Dewayne Layne
Defendant:
Grundy County, TN and John Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL et al v. CRYSTAL RUN VILLAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04633
Plaintiff:
JOHN BELL and JACQUELINE PINNIX BELL
Defendant:
CRYSTAL RUN VILLAGE, INC. and LAURA L. SKINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dupree v. Thomas et al
as 3:2009cv00714
Petitioner:
Christopher Dupree
Respondent:
Lane Thomas, John Bell, Joy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Georgetown v. Rader et al
as 3:2009cv00634
Petitioner:
Walter R. Georgetown
Respondent:
Warden Rader, Lane Thomas, John Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
