Cases 111 - 120 of 8,046
Burks et al v. ASI Lloyds
as 4:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Nichole Burks and Aurora Deannist Burks
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Neal v. Summit County Sheriff Kandy Fatheree et al.
as 5:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Marc Neal
Defendant:
Summit County Sheriff Kandy Fatheree, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., Summit Psychological Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols et al v. Buildzoom, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Eon Nichols and Marthia Nichols
Defendant:
Buildzoom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Farris E. Mallo
Respondent:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Sydney Zuiker, Nate Spinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khali M. Bey v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Khali M. Bey
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Department of Children and Family Services, Jocelin Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WIRTZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA WIRTZ, DAVID WIRTZ, FRANCES WIRTZ and others
Defendant:
ERICSSON INC., ERICSSON AB, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
United States v. Nichole Forde
as 24-1353
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nichole Marie Forde
FIFFIA v. WALMART INC
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE FIFFIA
Defendant:
WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
HUNTER, SR. v. NICHOLS et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
PATRICK HUNTER, SR.
Defendant:
CALVIN NICHOLS and SEBRI TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
