Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 320
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00286
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Michael Sheneman v. David Jones, et al
as 17-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL SHENEMAN
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID P. JONES, NEWBY LEWIS KAMINSK JONES LLP, BARBARA Z. BROOK, AUSA, in her official and personal capacities and others
Clark v. Baggett et al
as 7:2017cv00312
Plaintiff: Daniel Bartholomew Clark
Defendant: Angie Baggett, Gloria Crosby, N McMullin and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Midland Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00246
Plaintiff: John P. Jones and Facynthni Z. Hunter
Defendant: Midland Mortgage Corporation, MidFirst Bank, Government National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JONES v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv06531
Plaintiff: BRYAN P. JONES
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. Baggett et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00963
Plaintiff: Daniel Bartholomew Clark
Defendant: Angie Baggett, Gloria Crosby, N. McMullin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10791
Plaintiff: Carol P Jones
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens v. Shartle et al
as 4:2016cv00677
Plaintiff: Michael Thomas Stevens
Defendant: JT Shartle and P Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv01039
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Schnabl et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01355
Plaintiff: Derrick P Jones
Defendant: Meg Schnabl and Connie Acherson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?