Cases 131 - 140 of 1,182,878
Frankenfield v. Goodall et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
TDCJ Parole Division, Kenisha Turner and Gail Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puller v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Lt. Garcia and Lt. Howerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Stein et al
as 5:2024hc02086
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez and Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El
Respondent:
Joshua H. Stein, Jamie Bullard and North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acuna v. Jastal et al
as 5:2024ct03097
Plaintiff:
Raymondo Acuna
Defendant:
Lt. M. Jastal and Officer Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Alvarado-Guerrero v. USA
as 8:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Gustavo Alvarado-Guerrero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Croskery v. USA
as 1:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Cyrus Croskery
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
BUCHANAN v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
GERALD BUCHANAN
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fukama-Kabika v. Jones
as 2:2024cv02091
Petitioner:
Jean A Fukama-Kabika
Respondent:
Chance Jones
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBrahl-Daniels v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00519
Petitioner:
Leatrice Malika DeBrahl-Daniels
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Petitioner:
Tyree Jackson
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
