Cases 151 - 160 of 587
Acosta v. Quality Health Services, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01345
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Ivo Ngoson and Quality Health Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Addison
as 2:2018cv00092
Respondent:
Sheri Addison
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Samaritan Caregivers, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02036
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Samaritan Caregivers, LLC and Sone E. Ekukole
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Acosta v. AWP, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01183
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
AWP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Maru Grand Rapids, LLC, et al.
as 1:2018cv01175
Defendant:
Maru Restaurant LLC, Maru East Lansing, LLC, Maru Midland, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Triple V Concrete Construction, Inc., et al
as 0:2018cv02942
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Jennifer Vanderwerf, Layne Vanderwerf and Triple V Concrete Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. FORMICA DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04452
Defendant:
STEVEN FORMICA, FORMICA DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING, INC., MICHAEL FORMICA and others
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
R. Alexander Acosta v. Blissful Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03187
Defendant:
ENA Hotels, LLC, Blissful Enterprises, LLC and Akhilbhai Patel
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Dept. of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DeOtte et al v. Azar et al
as 4:2018cv00825
Plaintiff:
Hotze Health & Wellness Center, Yvette DeOtte, John Kelley and others
Defendant:
R. Alexander Acosta, Alex M. Azar, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ACOSTA v. SPREAD BAGELRY LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04307
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
LARRY ROSENBLUM, DIDIANE ARNUTI, SPREAD BAGELRY PENN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
