Voting Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 3,619
Madrial v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00372
Plaintiff: Pearl O. Madrial
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
La Union Del Pueblo Entero, et al v. Gregory W. Abbott, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00844
Plaintiff: La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Friendship-West Baptist Church, The Anti-Defamation League Austin, Southwest, and Texoma and others
Consolidated Defendant: Isabel Longoria, Jacque Callanen, Yvonne Ramon and others
Defendant: Jose A. Esparza, Lupe C. Torres, Gregory W. Abbott and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Houston Justice, Houston Area Urban League, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Dana DeBeauvoir
Amicus Curiae: Foundation for Government Accountability, John R. Ashcroft, Young Black Lawyers' Organizing Coalition and others
Petitioner: Public Interest Legal Foundation, Harris County Republican Party, Dallas County Republican Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
LULAC v. Guillen
as 22-50407
Plaintiff / Appellee: League of United Latin American Citizens, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mi Familia Vota and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Sheila Jackson Lee, Alexander Green, Jasmine Crockett and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Texas House Members, Ryan Guillen, Brooks Landgraf, and John Lujan, Ryan Guillen, Texas House Member, Brooks Landgraf, Texas House Member and others
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC et al v. BYRD
as 4:2023cv00165
Plaintiff: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND INC and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP
Defendant: CORD BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER et al v. LEE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00201
Defendant: LAUREL M LEE, CRAIG LATIMER, PENNY OGG and others
Plaintiff: UNIDOSUS, Poder Latinx, HISPANIC FEDERATION and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00828
Plaintiff: CHESTON J. ROBERTS
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, DIEGO MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Voice of the Experienced et al v. Ardoin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00331
Plaintiff: Voice of the Experienced, Power Coalition for Equity and Justice and League of Women Voters of Louisiana
Defendant: R. Kyle Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. State Board of Election Commissioners et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00734
Plaintiff: Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Dr. Andrea Wesley, Dr. Joseph Wesley and others
Defendant: State Board of Election Commissioners, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Intervenor Defendant: Mississippi Republican Executive Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff: Colby Sean Wells
Defendant: Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Bellows
as 23-1361
Plaintiff / Appellee: PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION INC
Defendant / Appellant: SHENNA BELLOWS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of State for the State of Maine
Amicus Curiae: ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?