Cases 11 - 20 of 24,105
Huffman v. Large et al
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Pres Huffman
Defendant:
C. Large, Parks, K. Helton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Jay Conference Bryant Park LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04860
Plaintiff:
Grace Evans
Defendant:
Jay Conference Bryant Park LLC, Jack Srour, Juda Srour and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GREENE v. IDT ENERGY et al
as 2:2024cv02824
Plaintiff:
AYANNA GREENE
Defendant:
IDT ENERGY, PARK POWER LLC and ROUND TABLE MARKETING LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lozano v. Parks
as 1:2024cv11633
Plaintiff:
Mario R. Lozano
Defendant:
William C. Parks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Morgan v. Group Health Plan Inc.
as 0:2024cv02465
Plaintiff:
Ashley N. Morgan
Defendant:
Group Health Plan Inc. doing business as Park Nicollet Health Care Products
SABRA HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS III, LLC et al v. SH SA TE LLC et al
as 2:2024cv07226
Plaintiff:
SABRA HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS III, LLC, SABRA TEXAS HOLDINGS, L.P., SABRA SOUTHERN OPERATIONS I, LLC and others
Defendant:
SH SA TE LLC, CEDAR PARK NJ TE, LLC, CHANDLER NJ TE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aaron Templeton v. Scott Parks, et al
as 24-2091
Plaintiff:
AARON TEMPLETON
Defendant:
SCOTT PARKS and DEBRA GLEASON
Nieto v. City of Visalia et al
as 1:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Uriel Nieto
Defendant:
City of Visalia, Chief Jason Salazar, Antonio Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
William Custis v. David Doughty
as 24-6608
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PARKE CUSTIS
Respondent:
DAVID DOUGHTY, Sheriff, SHARIKA TOWNSEND, Probabation Officer and ANN WESSLES, Head of Probation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
