Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
In re: Kenneth Lewi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1694
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant - Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, JUDGE JAMES E. SHADID and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: ROBERT B. KUGLAR
LEWIS v. LYNCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv07528
Petitioner: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH , MR. ORTIZ , JAMES E. SHADID and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. USA
as 8:2016cv00274
Petitioner: David Burgess
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burgess v. United States of America
as 8:2015cv00425
Petitioner: David Burgess
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burgess v. USA
as 8:2015cv00217
Petitioner: David Burgess
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mack v. Burgess et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2015cv02128
Plaintiff: John Willie Mack, Jr
Defendant: John David Burgess, George David Reeves, Manuel J Ortuno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2013cv20180
Plaintiff: Wanda Burgess and David Burgess
Defendant: Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burgess et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as WVS/2:13-cv-20180
Plaintiff: Wanda Burgess and David Burgess
Defendant: Coloplast Corp.
Berry v. Burgess We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv11755
Plaintiff: Duane Berry
Defendant: David Burgess
Henry v. City of Collegedale et al
as 1:2011cv00380
Plaintiff: John Dewayne Henry
Defendant: City of Collegedale, David Burgess, Rick Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?