Cases 11 - 20 of 37
ARIBUABO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00893
Plaintiff:
IRA HORNE, MICHAEL COSGROVE, DUSTIN PRICE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aribuabo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00475
Plaintiff:
Ira Horne, Michael Cosgrove, Dustin Price and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. United States
as 2:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
Dawnte Duane Jackson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. City of Sturgis, Kentucky et al
as 4:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Tonja Gibson
Defendant:
City of Sturgis, Kentucky , Sturgis, Kentucky Police Department , Duane Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arthur Duane Jackson v. Ronald Davis
as 2:2017cv00990
Respondent:
Ronald Davis
Petitioner:
Arthur Duane Jackson
USA v. Benjamin Jackson, Sr.
as 16-30954
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BENJAMIN DUANE JACKSON, SR.
USA v. Benjamin Jackson
as 15-30500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BENJAMIN DUANE JACKSON
Jackson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14461
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jackson and Duane Jackson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2013cv01055
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson , Leonard M. Lujan , Marcus Jackson and others
Defendant:
State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2013at00457
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson , LEONARD M LUJAN , MARCUS JACKSON and others
Defendant:
State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
