Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 215
Republican National Committee et al v. Aguilar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff: Republican National Committee, Nevada Republican Party and Scott Johnston
Defendant: Francisco Aguilar, Lorena Portillo, Hoen Scott William and others
Intervenor: Rise Action Fund, Institute for a Progressive Nevada and Nevada Alliance for Retired Americans
Amicus Curiae: ACLU of Nevada and Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 20507 Administration of Voter Registration
Republican National Committee et al v. Benson et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff: Republican National Committee, Jordan Jorritsma and Emerson Silvernail
Defendant: Jocelyn Benson and Jonathan Brater
Intervenor: Detroit Disability Power, Michigan Alliance for Retired Americans and League of Women Voters of Michigan
Petitioner: Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Harris v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff: Daryl Harris
Defendant: Ted Wheeler, Dan Ryan, Transitions Project Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Devin Wade v. Democratic National Committee
as 5:2024cv00309
Plaintiff: Devin Wade
Defendant: Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Republican National Committee et al v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Republican National Committee, Mississippi Republican Party, James Perry and others
Defendant: Justin Wetzel, Toni Jo Diaz, Becky Payne and others
Intervenor: Vet Voice Foundation and Mississippi Alliance for Retired Americans
Petitioner: Disability Rights Mississippi, League of Women Voters of Mississippi and Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant: MERRITT GARLAND, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, WILLIAM J. BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO GRAND JURY MATERIALS RELATING TO HACK OF DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2023mc00133
In Re: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO GRAND JURY MATERIALS RELATING TO HACK OF DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Petitioner: RYAN MILLIRON
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified: RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee: THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
LOGAN v. LAMONT et al
as 3:2023cv21174
Plaintiff: MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant: NED LAMONT, JOHN CARNEY, CHARLIE BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00862
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY and DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, KAREN BRINSON BELL, ALAN HIRSCH and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?