Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Hill v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Charlene Hall Hill
Petitioner:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis Allen Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al

as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
COTE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11061
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ALLEN COTE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jacobs v. Thompson et al
as 4:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Jacobs
Defendant:
Timothy Thompson, Dennis Allen Rolf, Max Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Whitehead v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15112
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS ALLEN WHITEHEAD
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Lindsey v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)

as 2:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
Dennis Allen Lindsey, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Charles Daniels, Arnaldo Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17389
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ALLEN MORGAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solsberry v. Board of Parole
as 1:2021cv00419
Petitioner:
Dennis Allen Solsberry
Respondent:
Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whitehead #179880 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00019
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Dennis Allen Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.