Cases 11 - 20 of 80,856
Edwards v. Mclean
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Martinez M Edwards
Defendant:
Joseph A Mclean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01343
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and ACTION NC
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as CHAIR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Kissimina et al v. Ed's Lobster Bar, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04261
Plaintiff:
Nade Kissimina, Marilyn Roxana Pinargote Urbina, Pedro Franco and others
Defendant:
Ed's Lobster Bar, LLC and Edward McFarland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Doll v. City of Trenton et al
as 2:2024cv11467
Plaintiff:
Edward Doll
Defendant:
City of Trenton, Blake Rusnak, Evan MacLeod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Edwards v. Delaware Department of Correction et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
William Jack Edwards
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Correction and VitalCore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Guritz v. James Corrigan
as 24-1484
Petitioner:
ROBERT EDWARD-OWEN GURITZ
Respondent:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Warden
Edwards v. TRC Staffing Services Inc.
as 1:2024cv02443
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edwards
Defendant:
TRC Staffing Services Inc. doing business as TRC Talent Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
