Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Strunge v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2026cv13004
Plaintiff:
Edward Strunge
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EDWARDS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2026cv07922
Plaintiff:
DINENE EDWARDS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Day v. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv02770
Unknown:
CLERK Ed Pulliam
Plaintiff:
Rodrequis Day
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc., XPO, Inc and Edward Smarr
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Mercier v. Ewell et al
as 2:2026cv12215
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Mercier
Defendant:
Edward Ewell, Jr and Wayne County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Newsom v. USA
as 4:2026cv00401
Petitioner:
Jack Edward Newsom
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Sandoval v. Beamer et al
as 3:2026cv01339
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edward Sandoval, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Dr. Warren Roberts and Ms. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Guillen v. Guillen et al
as 3:2026cv02171
Appellant:
Ernest Frank, Jr. Guillen
Defendant:
Edward Eli Guillen and JP Morgan Chase Bank n.a.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Replevin & Conversion
Smith v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2026cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Smith
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Edward Sniffen, Jr, Lindsey Maguigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Cowgill et al
as 3:2026cv00185
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Dotson
Defendant:
Cowgill, T Hurst, P McNulty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
