Cases 11 - 20 of 22
TERRY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv03039
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EDWARD TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv03040
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EDWARD TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. USA
as 1:2018cv00008
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Edward Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TERRY v. CLAY COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER
as 2:2018cv00012
Defendant:
CLAY COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EDWARD TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Fields et al
as 4:2016cv01268
Plaintiff:
Edwards Terry
Defendant:
Jerome Fields , Unknown Linhart and B. Mallard, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Ace American Insurance Company
as 4:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Edward Terry
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fountain v. Commonwealth Brands, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00632
Plaintiff:
Edward Terry Fountain
Defendant:
Commonwealth Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
KILPATRICK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91039
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TERRY KILPATRICK, JR., EDWARD TERRY KILPATRICK, JR., LAVAUN LUCILE KILPATRICK and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Diane Bolen et al v. Mentor Corporation
as 4:2009cv05024
Plaintiff:
Diane Bolen, Diane Bolen, Diane Bolen and others
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Diane Bolen et al v. Mentor Corporation
as 2:2009cv00678
Plaintiff:
Diane Bolen, Diane Bolen, Diane Bolen and others
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
