Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Fuller et al v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2013ct03027
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Fuller, David A. Hoskins, Eric A. Gayton and others
Defendant:
Yolanda M. Gause, Sgt. Coveton, Sgt. Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard Hamilton v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-70011
:
In re: BERNARD LEE HAMILTON
Petitioner:
BERNARD LEE HAMILTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
ADAMIK, Officer, WHITSON, Sergeant, T. LEE, Sergeant and others
Fuller v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Gena G. Fuller
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FULLER et al v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60928
Plaintiff:
GARLAND G. FULLER , JERIL LEE FULLER and DIANE LEE GIROUARD
Defendant:
NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Cullen et al
as 3:2010cv05219
Plaintiff:
Rick P. Smith
Defendant:
Vincent S. Cullen, Reynolds, D. Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddle v. Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
Justin Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
Sheriff Department and Tim G. Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddle v. Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2010cv00595
Plaintiff:
Justin Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
Sheriff Department and Tim G. Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddle v. Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2010mc00086
Plaintiff:
Justin Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
Sheriff Department and Tim G. Fuller
Byng v. Fuller et al
as 6:2009cv01008
Plaintiff:
Kevin V. Byng
Defendant:
Mr. Paul G. Fuller and Ms. Bonnie Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gary Hines v. S. Adamik, et al
as 09-15817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY DALE HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ADAMIK, J. R. WARD, G. FULLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
