Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Damon McCormick v. Kendra Robinson, et al
as 19-5199
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN PARRISH, Deputy, LESLIE GIBSON, Colonel, Henderson County Jail, KENDRA ROBINSON, Nurse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMON MCCORMICK
Davis et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Virginia Davis and Henry Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Henry Davis
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis, Jr. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09565
Plaintiff:
Mark Henry Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Osborne v. Davis et al
as 2:2018cv00336
Plaintiff:
Karen Osborne
Defendant:
Henry Davis and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2017cv00457
Petitioner:
Robert Henry Davis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Jason Davis
as 16-15471
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON HENRY DAVIS
Clifford Etienne, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, et al
as 16-30806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD ETIENNE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, in his official capacity, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS and others
Relmon Henry Davis v. Dave Davey et al
as 2:2016cv04859
Defendant:
Steven Cooley, Dave Davey, Pasadena Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Relmon Henry Davis, III
Davis et al v. Baldwin
as 3:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
Henry Davis , Douglas Coleman , Aaron Fillmore and others
Defendant:
John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
