Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Rita Hoke v. Daniel Abrams, et al
as 18-1655
Plaintiff:
RITA HOKE
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL J. ABRAMS and ASHWINI SHARAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMERON C. HORAN
Abrams v. Washington, D.C., State of et al
as 3:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Abrams
Defendant:
Washington, D.C., State of, V.A. and Tammy Vazqis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
George Dernis, et al v. Amos Financial, et al
as 16-1790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE DERNIS, husband and MARIA DERNIS, wife
Defendant - Appellee:
AMOS FINANCIAL, an Illinois limited liability company, PREMIER BANK, an Illinois bank, ZULFIKAR ESMAIL, Husband and others
Ates v. Royal et al
as 1:2016cv01506
Plaintiff:
Casey Ates
Defendant:
C. Ashley Royal and Leslie J. Abrams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dernis et al v. Amos Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
George Dernis and Maria Dernis
Defendant:
Amos Financial, LLC , Zulfikar Esmail , Shamim Esmail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Peters v. Osborne et al
as 1:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Gary F Peters
Defendant:
Richard M Osborne, Ian J Abrams, Wilbur Eugene Argo and others
Movant:
John Durgerian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Timothy Patrick McLanahan v. Brad Grey et al
as 2:2013cv09381
Defendant:
J. Abrams, Bad Robot, Inc., Brian Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick McLanahan
Abrams et al v. Moore et al
as 1:2013cv01113
Plaintiff:
Leon J. Abrams and Sergio B. Ramirez
Defendant:
Dakota R. Moore , Jerrod Pelot , Mizel Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
