Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Aguilar et al v. Dankenbring et al
as 4:2014cv00984
Plaintiff:
Richard Aguilar , Melba Aguilar , Clark Amos and others
Defendant:
James Dankenbring and Spencer Fane Britt & Browne, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Joseph Resch, et al v. Krapf's Coaches Inc
as 13-3947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITA M. KING, JOSEPH RESCH, SCOTT BEINLICH and others
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELIZABETH MCNAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
KRAPF'S COACHES INC
Openmind Solutions, Inc. v. Holland
as 2:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
Openmind Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
John Holland
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hays v. Conference Technologies Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv02142
Plaintiff:
Carol Hays
Defendant:
Conference Technologies Incorporated and John Holland
Miscellaneou:
Dewun R. Settle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Holland v. BNSF Railway Company
as 6:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
John Holland
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Holland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00240
Plaintiff:
John Holland
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brown, et al. vs. Peter Francis Jude Beagle Law Office, et al.
as 5:2008cv03311
Plaintiff:
Rufus E Brown, James R Brown and Berniece Williams
Defendant:
Peter Francis Jude Beagle Law Office, George C Smith, John Holland Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Columbus Division of Police et al.
as 2:2008cv02666
Defendant:
Berniece Williams, Columbus Division of Police, Peter Francis and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
John Holland v. Minnesota Mining Manufacturing C, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-87397
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining Manufacturing C
Plaintiff:
John Holland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
