Cases 11 - 20 of 41
BANKS v. OWENS et al
as 2:2017cv05423
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN K. BANKS
Defendant:
JAMES OWENS, MEGHAN BACHMAN , KENNETH D. KLEINMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00495
Plaintiff:
Todd M. Terrell
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick v. King et al
as 3:2017cv00470
Plaintiff:
Jackie Ray Patrick
Defendant:
Ronald King, Wendell K. Banks, Unknown Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BANKS
as 1:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DORIS K. BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hammad Akram, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90097
Plaintiff - Respondent:
HAMMAD AKRAM, IMMAN AKRAM, JOEL ARDOIN and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Hammad et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00672
Plaintiff:
Akram Hammad , Imman Akram , Joel Ardoin and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nachurs Alpine Solutions Corp v. Banks et al
as 5:2015cv04015
Plaintiff:
Nachurs Alpine Solutions Corp
Defendant:
Brian K Banks and Nutra-Flo Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Mike's Pipe Inspection, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Mike's Pipe Inspection, Inc., Billy Myers, Barbara Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv10687
Plaintiff:
Sharon K. Banks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOLDSTEIN v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
as 1:2013mc00445
Petitioner:
CHARLES R. GOLDSTEIN
Respondent:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Movant:
FDIC AS RECEIVER FOR K BANK
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
