Cases 11 - 20 of 41
MILLS et al v. APPLE INC.
as 3:2018cv00780
Plaintiff:
JUDY MILLS , JUDITH DEAN , CARLA COMPAGNONE and others
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Reece v. L. Whitley, et al
as 16-6793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
L. RAY WHITLEY, CHRIS VINES, WILLIAM LAMBERTH and others
In Re Ford Tailgate Litigation
as 3:2011cv02953
Plaintiff:
Michael Andosca, Lynne Benson, Keith Bova and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Buck v. Kelly et al
as 1:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Larry L Buck
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Robert Bernard Reichard and Melvin Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Faulkner, Jr. v. Phillips et al
as 3:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Faulkner, Jr.
Defendant:
Ken Phillips, Posner, M. Farias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buck v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05923
Plaintiff:
Cassandra L Buck
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Ortho, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan and Gary L Buck
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Dorothy Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner, Jr. v. State of California et al
as 3:2015cv00780
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Faulkner, Jr.
Defendant:
State of California, M. Farias and L Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buck v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02288
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Buck
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
