Cases 11 - 20 of 2,793
Lancaster v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024ct03150
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Mashell L. Wilson, Timothy L. Lewis, Mr. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAK Development LLC et al v. City of Lincoln, Nebraska et al
as 4:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
MAK Development LLC A Nebraska Limited Liability Company doing business as Michael House and Michael Corrado
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Nebraska and Lincoln-Lancaster County Planning Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Charles v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Defendant:
Bob Anderson, Anna Hammond, Amelia Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel James Harper v. F. Flores et al
as 2:2024cv04623
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
F. Flores and CSP Lancaster Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Symonette et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 8:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Deutshe Bank National Trust Company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barnette v. MUSC-Lancaster Medical Center
as 0:2024cv01794
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn H Barnette
Defendant:
MUSC-Lancaster Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
In re: Christopher Seckington
as 24-11848
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER SECKINGTON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LANCASTER CI WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
