Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Perkins v. Jones et al
as 2:2013cv02272
Defendant:
Leslie A Jones and Cathy L Tabor
Plaintiff:
Ronald Keith Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Upton et al v. BNFL, Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Christopher T Upton , Leslie D Jones , Jeffery L Keylon and others
Defendant:
BNFL, Inc , TSB FA Nuclear Services, Inc. , R&R Electric Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Scottland et al
as 2:2012cv00633
Plaintiff:
Leslie James Jones
Defendant:
A Z Scottland, T Wable, P. R. Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genworth Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. Jones et al
as 3:2011cv00594
Plaintiff:
Genworth Life & Annuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kenneth Wayne Jones, Jr. , Denise Catherine Ashburn, Lisa L. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leslie D. Jones v. BNFL, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-93093
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Jones
Defendant:
BNFL, Inc
JONES v. BNFL, INC et al
as 3:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
Leslie D Jones
Defendant:
BNFL, Inc , American Technologies Inc and R and R Electric Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. BNFL, INC et al
as 2:2009cv93093
Plaintiff:
LESLIE D. JONES, LESLIE D. JONES, LESLIE D. JONES and others
Defendant:
BNFL, INC, AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES INC, AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jones v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv01232
Plaintiff:
Leslie J. Jones
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones #292708 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
Leslie Eugene Jones #292708
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
