Cases 11 - 20 of 526
Carter v. Southern Regional Jail
as 5:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Frederick Carter
Defendant:
Southern Regional Jail, Mace, Booking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mouzon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv10911
Plaintiff:
Robbie Mouzon
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Carlett Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahman v. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Raheem Rahman
Defendant:
J. Nines, Tames, Yes Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mace v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2023cv02426
Plaintiff:
Kelley Justin Mace
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and Michael P Santosassimo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mace v. Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
Ruben Mace
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mace v. Wisely et al
as 7:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Donald Mace
Defendant:
Amanda McDonald Wisely and Timothy C. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mace et al
as 3:2023cv03597
Plaintiff:
Juan V Anderson
Defendant:
David Mace, Sergeant Stuart, Deputy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Texas et al
as 3:2023cv03550
Not Classified By Court:
Juan V Anderson
Defendant:
State of Texas, Waller County Texas, David Mace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28005
Plaintiff:
LEONARD MACE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21641
Plaintiff:
JASON MACE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
