Cases 11 - 20 of 240
King v. State of Washington et al
as 4:2023cv05137
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael King
Defendant:
State of Washington and Department of Licencing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
King v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael King
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Daniels v. PennyMac Loan Services
as 23-20328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Lee Daniels, III
Defendant / Appellee:
PennyMac Loan Services, L.L.C., SWBC Mortgage Corporation, Citibank and others
Bates v. Woodward et al
as 1:2023cv10363
Plaintiff:
JANET BATES
Defendant:
TRAVIS WOODWARD, JARED WRIGHT, HERBERT VANRIPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
King et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00196
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Michael King and Deborah J King
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Incorporated, DePuy Products Incorporated, DePuy Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01818
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
King v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael King
Defendant:
J. J. Scarborough, John (last name unknown) and Larry Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Gomez et al
as 2:2022cv12169
Plaintiff:
Chad Eric Bryant
Defendant:
Miguel Gomez, Ebony Rasco, Bobby Jo Villanueva and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
