Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Wilcox v. Shartle
as 4:2016cv00242
Petitioner:
Kenneth Michael Wilcox
Respondent:
JT Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matthew Tye et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01615
Plaintiff:
Harry Schmoll, Matthew Tye and Michael Wilcox
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
NUTRIMOST, LLC v. WERFEL et al
as 2:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
NUTRIMOST, LLC
Defendant:
HOWARD I. WERFEL, 40 DAY RESET MANHATTAN, INC., 40 DAY RESET HOBOKEN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Bailey et al v. Republic Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00403
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bailey , Ruth Miller , Leland Miller and others
Defendant:
Republic Services, Inc. , Allied Services, LLC and Bridgeton Landfill, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilcox v. Total Health and Fitness of Utah County et al
as 2:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Dan Wilcox
Defendant:
Total Health and Fitness of Utah County , Michael Wilcox and Julie Wilcox
Counter_claimant:
Total Health and Fitness of Utah County , Michael Wilcox and Julie Wilcox
Counter_defendant:
Dan Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
USA v. Kenneth Wilcox
as 14-10054
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH MICHAEL WILCOX
Warren v. Fulton County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv04299
Plaintiff:
Valencia Warren
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff's Department, Randolph Scott, W. Angry and others
May et al v. Wilcox et al
as 2:2012cv00436
Plaintiff:
Edward Michael May , Ora L. May , P. D. and others
Defendant:
James Michael Wilcox and James D. Wilcox, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
May et al v. Wilcox et al
as 2:2012cv00436
Defendant:
James Michael Wilcox, James Dean Wilcox, James D. Wilcox, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Michael May and Phillip Dugger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
