Cases 11 - 20 of 29
TWARDZIK v. DEVERO
as 2:2020cv04105
Plaintiff:
JASON TWARDZIK
Defendant:
OFFICER ELLIS DEVERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLINS v. CITY OF PLEASANTIVILLE et al
as 1:2020cv05984
Defendant:
PATROL OFFICER VANSYCKLE, JOHN DOE INVESTIGATORS 1-5, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD D. COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards v. Griffey et al
as 4:2020cv04040
Defendant:
Officer Leakes, Jane Doe, Officer Webb and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Antonio Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Smith et al
as 4:2020cv04012
Defendant:
Officer Ellis, Corporal Smith, Sergeant Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Caelin Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, A Johnson, Officer Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watford v. Ellis et al
as 3:2016cv00582
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Watford
Defendant:
Officer Ellis, Brad Bramlet, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kargbo v. New Hampshire
as 15-8035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABU B. KARGBO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. O'MARA, Superintendent, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, CARL M. BROWN, Sergeant, JONATHAN PLUMPTON, Officer and others
Watford v. Ellis et al
as 3:2015cv00567
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Watford
Defendant:
Officer Ellis, Brad Bramlet, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Warden et al
as 1:2013cv05307
John Doe:
Department of Security, Unit Capt. and Warden
Defendant:
Officer Diangilious, Officer Ellis and Officer Jones
Plaintiff:
Terry King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cepeda v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03350
Plaintiff:
Christian Cepeda
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Ellis and Police Officer John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
