Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Horne v. Corrections Officer Barber et al
as 5:2018cv00172
Defendant:
6 "Unknown Officers", Corrections Officer Barber, Lt. B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Duffy et al
as 1:2018cv00436
Defendant:
Officer Crig, Justin Amaral, Captain Duffy and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel O. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Townsend v. Wilson et al
as 3:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
TyJuan Develle Townsend
Defendant:
L. Wilson, John Doe, 1, John Doe , 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Guice, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00725
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Jordan
Defendant:
Officer Guice, Leeposey Daniels, Officer Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart Tompkins v. Department of Correction
as 13-6815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, OFFICER HUNT, OFFICER BARBER and others
Defendant:
J. N. VAUGHAN, BILL CARROL, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Ward v. Barber et al
as 1:2013cv01011
Defendant:
Officer Barber and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stuart Tompkins v. Department of Correction
as 12-6741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, J. N. VAUGHAN, OFFICER HUNT and others
Estrada v. Davis et al
as 3:2011cv00615
Plaintiff:
Albert Estrada
Defendant:
Donald Davis, T.D. Anderson, Captain Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Incammicia et al
as 2:2011cv02770
Defendant:
C.O. Accordino, C.O. Arimini, Dr. Kamil Atta-, MH and others
Plaintiff:
Paris Maurice Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tompkins v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010ct03224
Plaintiff:
Stuart Wayne Tompkins
Defendant:
Department of Correction, J.N. Vaughan, Officer Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
