Cases 11 - 20 of 265
Dudley v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Robert Steven Dudley
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Diana Gonzales, Stephanie Porras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Arnold et al
as 8:2023cv04357
Plaintiff:
Lynn K Arnold
Defendant:
Robert Steven Arnold, Marsha Arnold Hapeshis, Dylan Scott Arnold Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FORISH v. BRASILE et al
as 2:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEVEN FORISH
Defendant:
JOHN BRASILE, CHUCK McDOWELL, JR., LATROBE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Stevens
as 23-1149
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL ROBERT STEVENS
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06653
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEVENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Conner v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 3:2023pq00882
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Robert Steven Conner
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STEVENS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEVENS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SSAOGCOMMS and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stevens v. USA
as 1:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Stevens
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
OWENS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22757
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEVEN OWENS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Robert Stevens Young
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
