Cases 11 - 20 of 4,607
Rodgers v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 6:2024cv00303
Defendant:
Tahlequah, City of, Keith Fisher, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Deboraugh Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. Shelby County Criminal Court
as 2:2024cv02604
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Court
Petitioner:
Octavious D. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stafford v. East Central Mental Health et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00525
Defendant:
Lisa Turpid, Serious Injuries Law Group, FBI and others
Plaintiff:
Daffney Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2024cv00704
Defendant:
Ivo Jones, Larry Rodgers, Charles Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Roosevelt Rodgers, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Top Gauge Energy, LLC
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Rodgers, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
Top Gauge Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hanlon v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv07349
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Sodexo, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rodger Hanlon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Nitkin v. Clark et al
as 2:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Nitkin
Defendant:
Keith Rodgers, Romero and Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Weems v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2024cv00764
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rodger C. Weems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
