Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Brown et al v. Kenner Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv03445
Plaintiff:
Armond Brown, Sr. , Jaronet S Whitaker , Joshua Brown and others
Defendant:
Kenner Police Department, Michael Glaser, Kenner City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forest Whitaker, et al v. CIR
as 16-73450
Petitioner - Appellant:
FOREST S. WHITAKER and KEISHA WHITAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Adkison Engineers Inc v. Flatiron West, Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00640
Counter Defendant:
Adkison Engineers Inc
Plaintiff:
Adkison Engineers Inc
Cross Claimant:
City of Los Angeles
Unknown:
Ronald S Whitaker and Ronald S Whitaker
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Flatiron West, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Flatiron West, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Roes and Travelers Casualty and Surey Company of America Inc
Bertanelli v. Walker et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Unknown Walker, Unknown Smith-Whitson, Unknown Heat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Walker et al
as 4:2015cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Unknown Walker, Unknown Smith-Whitson, Unknown Heat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Smith-Whitson et al
as 2:2015cv02015
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Unknown Smith-Whitson, Unknown Walker, Unknown Heat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Schlossberg
as 1:2012cv01090
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Whitaker
Defendant:
Allen Schlossberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Eveland
as 1:2012cv01088
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Whitaker
Defendant:
Thomas S. Eveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Astrue (CONSENT)
as 2:2012cv00812
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Whitaker
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
