Cases 11 - 20 of 55,153
HOUCK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
MARK HOUCK and RYAN-MARIE HOUCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL ROGERS, JUAN BARRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
IN RE AT&T SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 3:2024cv01196
Not Yet Classified:
AT&T Inc Securities Litigation
Plaintiff:
John Brazinsky, Teachers Retirement System of the City of New York, New York City Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, Randall L Stephenson, John T Stankey and others
Petitioner:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Bridget N Smagala Revocable Trust, Suresh Kodali and others
Moaf et al v. Casey et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Mohsen Moaf and Jacqueline A Moaf
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Dan Gordon, Robert Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Elliott v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Stephen Lee Elliott
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephens et al v. AT&T et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Raelun Stephens, Sr. and KR&R Appliance
Defendant:
AT&T and Automation Personnel Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Yang v. Townsquare Media, Inc.
as 7:2024cv03841
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
Townsquare Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Keer v. Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00818
Petitioner:
Timothy Stephen Keer
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Quehanna Boot Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
