Cases 11 - 20 of 3,382
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Twyne-Stokes v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2024cv03336
Plaintiff:
Charise Twyne-Stokes
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Mississippi Bar v. Rose
as 3:2024ad00004
Interested Party:
Whitney Dilmore, Porfi Stokes, Arthur Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Marquis Deshun Rose
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Stokes v. Kendall et al
as 5:2024cv04533
Defendant:
Brian Kendall, Zanika Brailsford, Mary Bramucci and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
STOKES et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00281
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CINDY STOKES and ANDY STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Smith et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv06007
Plaintiff:
Michael Snyder, Hubert Spires, Wayne A. Spaid, Jr and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Viegas et al v. Braswell et al
as 1:2024cv02175
Defendant:
Dafney Dubuisson Stokes, Maritza Dominguez Braswell and Toyota Financial Services
Plaintiff:
James Viegas and Keri Lynn Viegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antwone Stokes v. Los Angeles Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2024cv06684
Defendant:
Redd, Nam, Los Angeles Sheriff Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Antwone Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Rogers
as 3:2024ad00003
Interested Party:
Porfi Stokes, Whitney Dilmore, Patricia Green and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Guy N. Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
