Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Pray et al v. Marion County, Florida et al
as 5:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
William Pray and Selia Ann Pray
Defendant:
Marion County Board of County Commissioners, Steven Holmes, Marion County, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Steven Holmes
as 19-1495
Defendant / Appellant:
Steven Holmes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes #168635 v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv00973
Defendant:
Heather Bittner, Heidi Smith, Corizon Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Holmes #168635
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corp. v. Skiba et al
as 2:2016cv02078
Plaintiff:
Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corp.
Defendant:
Joshua Skiba, Tiffany Gamble and Steven Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corp. v. Skiba et al
as 1:2016cv02078
Plaintiff:
Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corp.
Defendant:
Joshua Skiba, Tiffany Gamble and Steven Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gaither v. Ala, et al
as 6:2011cv00143
Defendant:
Warden Charles W. Ala, Community Education Centers, Thomas Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampson v. Holmes et al
as 3:2010cv00240
Defendant:
Ascension Parish Jail, Michelle Guerin and Steven Holmes
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
