Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Holmes v. AmerCable Corporation
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Steven Holmes
Defendant:
Amercable Corporation doing business as Nexans Amercable, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Moon v. Bramlett et al
as 4:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
Kim Bramlett, Lynn Lyons, Ned Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
HOLMES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2022cv01624
Petitioner:
STEVEN HOLMES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes et al v. Fresenius Kidney Care of Tuskegee et al
as 3:2021cv00578
Plaintiff:
Steven Holmes and Paulette Holmes
Defendant:
Fresenius Kidney Care of Tuskegee and Shirley Blevins Carrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29718
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HOLMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jaquez v. Holmes et al
as 3:2021cv00072
Defendant:
Denise Holmes and Steven Holmes
Plaintiff:
Angel Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jaquez v. Holmes et al
as 3:2020cv01604
Defendant:
Denise Holmes and Steven Holmes
Plaintiff:
Angel Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes et al v. Fresenius Kidney Care of Tuskegee et al
as 3:2020cv00853
Defendant:
Shirley Blevins Carrington and Fresenius Kidney Care of Tuskegee
Plaintiff:
Paulette Holmes and Steven Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2020cv02040
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven Holmes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
