Cases 11 - 20 of 526
Bastin v. Orange County Corrections Dept. et al
as 6:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
William Edward Bastin
Defendant:
Orange County Corrections Dept., Sgt Kirby, Correction Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19268
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EDWARD MAYO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAYDU v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14370
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EDWARD HAYDU
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hutchison v. Reeves et al
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Hutchison, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge William Edward Reeves and Missouri Public Defender System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Gabriel
as 5:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lee Dunn
Defendant:
William Edward Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. William Maddox, Jr.
as 23-4365
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM EDWARD MADDOX, JR., a/k/a Unc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
OBRIEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10945
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EDWARD OBRIEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Welk et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Welk, Carlos Campos, Kenneth Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Oliver v. Michaud et al
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oliver and Clyde Shelton
Defendant:
Joseph Leonard Michaud, Mary Susan McElroy, John James McConnell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
