Cases 11 - 20 of 353
Lishman et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01570
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Inc Caterpillar, Crane Co. and others
Counter Defendant:
Nash Engineering Co., Inc., Flowserve US Inc., Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Tate Andale, Inc., Velan Valve Corp., Honeywell International Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
John Crane Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vicki Lishman
Cross Claimant:
Grinnell LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BAGLEY et al v. ABB, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03531
Cross Defendant:
THOMAS BAGLEY, ELIZABETH BAGLEY, BEAZER EAST, INC. and others
Defendant:
ABB, INC., BIRD CORPORATION, BRAND INSULATIONS, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., COPES VULCAN, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Weaver et al v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
William Weaver and Judy Weaver
Defendant:
3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DATA et al v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv00879
Cross Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING CO., CARVER PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
MW CUSTOM PAPERS, LLC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., MESTEK, INC. and others
Defendant:
POWERMASTER PACIFIC PRODUCTS, MET-PRO CORPORATION, BAKER HUGHES, a GE Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE DATA, MICHAEL DATA and DARLENE DATA, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL DATA, DECEASED,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Brulport v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JEAN BRULPORT and Barbara Jean Brulport, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Steven Bruce Brulport, Deceased
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Aerco International, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Parker et al v. Alfa Laval Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, BW/IP International Incorporated, Pfizer Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
David Parker and Sharon Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Clark et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv00692
Defendant:
3M Company, Beaty Investments Inc, Fluor Constructors International and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Payne Clark and Shannon Payne Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
