Cases 21 - 30 of 1,670
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boykins v. Dortch et al
as 3:2024cv50056
Plaintiff:
Byron Boykins
Defendant:
Christine Brannon Dortch, Andrea Tack, Mr. Manzano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diogu v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II
Defendant:
Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Seana Willing, Amanda M. Kates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forbes v. United States of America
as 24-160
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS FORBES
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Forbes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Arthur Forbes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
ALEX JONES, ALICIA GILLEN, ALYSON MCGILL and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Forbes v. Ballard
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
James Forbes
Defendant:
Robin Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Punke et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
. Punke, . Henry, D. Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. McCrensky et al
as 1:2023cv13213
Defendant:
Katherine Forbes, Rebecca McCrensky and Katherine Flanders
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
