Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Taylor v. Myers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00653
Petitioner: Farron Alexander Taylor
Respondent: Myers, Alabama Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00531
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Donnell Alexander Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Donnell Taylor
as 16-9528
Movant: In re: DONNELL ALEXANDER TAYLOR, a/k/a Juice
:
Taylor v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv30183
Plaintiff: Kent Alexander Taylor
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Taylor v. Solberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv03159
Plaintiff: Yuri Alexander Taylor
Defendant: C. Solberg, M. Richer and Shinnick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00371
Plaintiff: Aricke Alexander Taylor
Defendant: Leeposey Daniels, Leon Bolling, Lt. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutton v. Hinkaty et al
as 3:2012cv02533
Plaintiff: Jonathan Hutton
Defendant: Charles J. Hinkaty, Ingrid Jackel, Bruce E. Kanter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Taylor v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00549
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Donnell Alexander Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Taylor v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv30282
Plaintiff: Kent Alexander Taylor
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
TAYLOR v. LOCKETT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00279
Respondent: CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Petitioner: DONNELL ALEXANDER TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?