Cases 21 - 30 of 7,400
Linder v. Tolson et al
as 9:2024cv03159
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wayne Linder
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John G. Hicks, Sgt. Ratchford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Miranda Hicks
Defendant:
O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hicks v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01874
Plaintiff:
Linda Hicks
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Hicks v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Darnell Hicks
Defendant:
Captain Zimmerman, Ossining NY OVAC, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
United States, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashley MaxwellIn re: Ashley Maxwell
as 24-50390
Petitioner:
In re: Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell, Mistie Sharp and others
Respondent:
Fund Texas Choice, North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Hicks et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
TED HICKS and GRAND LAKE LLC
Defendant:
United States, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Col. Cullen Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Scott v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Waytayha Scott
Respondent:
Tikki M. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
