Cases 21 - 30 of 287
Jamerson v. Martin
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Spencer Jamerson
Defendant:
Leroy Martin and Sheriff Leroy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14037
Plaintiff:
BART JAMERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jamerson v. Martin
as 4:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Spencer Jamerson
Defendant:
Leroy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Frost et al
as 7:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Trevor Andrew Jones
Defendant:
Barbara Frost, Michael Berry, D. Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamerson v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
Michael C. Jamerson
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Hines
as 23-60201
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Eric Jamerson Hines
Jamerson v. Mackal
as 3:2023cv08070
Plaintiff:
Passion B Jamerson
Defendant:
Akeem Mackal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA Farm Labor, Inc. v. Su, et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
USA Farm Labor, Inc., JCP Farms, LLC, Lazy BS Bar, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Julie Su, Brent Parton and Brian Pasternak
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jamerson v. Lumpkin
as 23-10334
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Dewayne Jamerson
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tia Shepard, et al v. Walmart, Inc., et al
as 23-35220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIA SHEPARD, individually and behalf of A.S., a minor, FKA Tia Simmons and JAMERSON SHEPARD, individually and behalf of A.S., a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART, INC., a foreign corporation, DBA Wal-Mart and MAD ENGINE, LLC
Defendant:
S & C INTERNATIONAL, INC. and DOES, I-X
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
